Missouri Regional Envirothon

Judges' Scoring Sheet for Team Presentations

Scale for Scoring:       0= not at all        3= good or fairly well      Team Number ______________ 
   1= poor or poorly  4= excellent or very well   Room Number ______________
   2= fair or slightly well       5= outstanding   Judge's Number or initials __________
 Part I: Preparation & Presentation of Plan (30 pts. Maximum) Circle Score
A. How well did the presentation address or identify:  
l The interrelationship between the environment, natural resources and different natural resource management strategies? 0 1 2 3 4 5
l All the different players/interest groups affected by the problem? 0 1 2 3 4 5
l The major natural resources areas (aquatics, forestry, soils, wildlife)? 0 1 2 3 4 5
l The current issue? 0 1 2 3 4 5
l The specific environmental problem and related issues regarding the problem? 0 1 2 3 4 5
B. Were references and resources cited in the team presentation? 0 1 2 3 4 5
  Part I Subtotal
   
Part II: Application of Data (30 pts. Maximum)  
A. The team demonstrated a solid understanding of the political issue(s) related to the problem (regulations, mandates, impact on political system/community). 0 1 2 3 4 5
B. The team demonstrated a solid understanding of the ecological/environmental issue(s) related to the problem. 0 1 2 3 4 5
C. The team demonstrated a solid understanding of the economic issues(s) related to the problem including the cost and benefits of the proposed plan (cost of implementing the plan, economic impact on local resources, cost of doing nothing, future costs, funding source(s), etc.) 0 1 2 3 4 5
D.  The team demonstrated a solid understanding of the social and/or cultural issue(s) related to the problem (private property rights, traditions, clean and healthy environment, right to farm, urban issues, cultural issues, environmental justice). 0 1 2 3 4 5
E. The team presented one viable solution to the problem addressing the resource issue. 0 1 2 3 4 5
F. Solution in the presentation has potential to be applied or implemented with long-term sustainability to natural resources. 0 1 2 3 4 5
  Part II Subtotal
Part III: Quality of the Presentation (20 pts. Maximum)  
A. Presentation was well organized with a clear introduction and strong conclusion. 0 1 2 3 4 5
B. Participants enhanced the presentation (eye contact, gestures, voice inflection, originality, exhibited professionalism, etc.) 0 1 2 3 4 5
C.  Visual aids were used to make major points and show conclusions. (Visual aids should be correct, eye appealing, readable, neat, etc.) 0 1 2 3 4 5
D. Questions were answered logically and concisely by all team members participating. 0 1 2 3 4 5
  Part III Subtotal
Part IV: Required Elements (20 pts.)  
A.  Add up to ten points for team member participation in presentation. (Each team member gets up to 2 points for equal oral participation in presentation.) 0 2 4 6 8 10
  • Add up to ten points if the presentation was accomplished in the allotted time scale and the team made  effective use of their time. (Time scale is 6-7 minutes).
    		•  0 2 4 6 8 10
      Part IV Subtotal

    Point System for Oral Presentation

    10 points if   6 - 7 minutes

      8 points if   4 - 5 minutes

      6 points if   2 - 3 minutes

      4 points if   1 - 2 minutes

          2 point if less than 1minute

    		 Total Score:

    Part I: Pts. = _______

    Part II: Pts.= _______

    Part III: Pts. = ______

    Part IV: Pts. = ______

    Final Score ________

    (Out of 100 pts.)